|
Genre-Hopping
Your Way Out of the Midlist The
Midlist.
You know where that is, don’t you? Technically, the midlist is
the well-stuffed section of a publisher’s catalog full of books
written by authors who are neither debut nor bestsellers. For new
writers of commercial genre fiction, most especially in romance, this is
a clear and well-defined destination. No longer a newbie, a
midlister has a decent, if not magnificent, print run. A midlist
writer probably has a good agent, a fairly attentive editor, and a
growing audience. Life in the midlist is fine – not the fanciest house on the street, but, heck, it
is in an exclusive neighborhood. The lure of “lead” is out
there – the next destination, the next move up. That
is, unless you linger in the midlist too long. A few too many
books that don’t inch their way up in the sales catalog, and a writer
can face something much worse than languishing on the midlist:
Life Without Contracts. This can happen after just a few years or
a few books, primarily because one or two books sell only moderately
well, causing booksellers to reduce orders for the next one, resulting
in lower print runs. This is not an uncommon situation – one
that can either cause your publisher not to offer a new contract, or
force a writer to “relaunch” herself with a name booksellers don’t
recognize. Another
danger with an extended stay in the midlist is publishing infrequency.
A writer at a major house my be delighted to be playing with the “big
guys and girls” only to find the lead and bestselling authors get the
first and most slots – often with reissues – while a newer midlist
author is published once a year, if that. One
of the ways to avoid both low-to-no print runs and a paucity of pub
dates is to create a ‘safety net’ by publishing in multiple
sub-genres, such as paranormal, women’s fiction, historical,
contemporary, chick lit, comedy, young adult, and more. Publishing
within more than one sub-genre at the same time, or moving from one
sub-genre to another, offers a number of benefits, including: Of
course, the technique is not without its detractors. Some say that
hopping can dilute a writer’s audience, increase her marketing budget
and, worst of all, infuriate her publishing house. However, if you
choose between two or three sub-genres that share readers, handle the
issue of marketing and names properly, and work with your publisher(s)
to time releases for the most impact on sales, genre-hopping can be a
godsend to a midlist writer. Genre-hopping
is best done on a voluntary, planned basis. Several authors
interviewed for this article stated that they switched genres because
they were forced to because of dried up contracts, a new editor, or a
failed line. That kind of “imposed genre-hopping” has given
the practice a bad name, inducing stern warnings that writers should
“pick their niche” and stay with it. While
that is often wise advice, niche-picking and niche-staying can be
frustrating to prolific, ambitious, creative writers who not only are
able to write in multiple sub-genres, but want and need to for financial
and artistic reasons. In talking to a number of highly-productive
and motivated genre-hoppers, a few key pieces of advice emerged that
will help increase a writer’s success in moving between and among
multiple genres. They
are: Be
sure you have a hopping personality. Specifically,
genre-hopping is not for the feint of heart. You’ll need to
juggle multiple projects, deadlines, editors, personalities, and, most
importantly, writing styles. Your voice is your voice, and it will
shine through regardless of the sub-genre. But category romance
requires a different pacing than single title, and historical demands
phrasing true to the time period, and paranormal readers like their
prose dark. To accomplish this juggling act, you’ll need to be
organized and flexible. If you are neither of those things,
genre-hopping may not be your ticket out of mid-list. Know
your sub-genres and gauge their appeal to your muse.
There are some obvious differences at first glance: category is
shorter than single title; erotica is, well, more erotic than mainstream
romance; romantic suspense requires a dead body that contemporary
romance can do without. But there are also much more subtle
differences in tone, language, audience expectations, character types,
and taboos. To know them, you need to read within each sub-genre,
communicate with other writers in the sub-genre, and follow the reviews,
where you will get a sense of the story premises and themes. Once
you know the sub-genres well, you will recognize the opportunity to feed
your muse by trying your hand at different types of romance. For
many writers, this is a stronger impetus for hopping than any business
or financial reason. Multi-published
author Melanie Jackson hopped from the historical sub-genre to the
paranormal because she “wanted to write in a broader universe.”
She explains that the actual historical events and people confined the
reality in which she could write, “but in a world of time-travel and
magic, one can do anything and explain it away.” At the time she
wanted to make the switch, paranormals were “still looked at with
suspicion” and historicals were a known market. Her approach was
to write both until both her readers and her editor recognized her
success in paranormal, and today she’s happier writing in the wildly
popular sub-genre of paranormal and enjoying a much wider audience. Choose
sub-genres that will co-exist and support each other.
Ideally, there should be some cross -over of readership. The most
effective sub-genre hopping occurs where the cross-over audience is
built-in, such as mystery and romantic suspense, light comedy and
chick-lit, erotica and dark paranormal, or contemporary romance and
women’s fiction. Award-winning
author Brenda Novak writes romantic suspense single-title and long
contemporary romance. Brenda recommends that writers select their
sub-genres with the same care and consideration they would in investing
their money. “Writing for series (category romance) is like
investing in bonds,” she says. “They’re safer, more secure.
Single titles are like investing in stocks. They’re a little
riskier, but they have greater earning potential because they can hit a
list and stay on the shelf longer.” The only downside for Brenda
is “the work load.” She notes that writing for two sub-genres
“you have to be pretty prolific, and it’s not always easy to turn
out that many books in a year.” Play
the name game and realize the implications. You
have three choices when you genre-hop regarding your pen name(s).
You can keep one name for all sub-genres. The benefit of this is a
reduction of marketing costs – it does take an investment to build a
brand, run a web site, produce collateral, or increase name recognition.
The downside, of course, is the possibility of diluting that brand so
that readers don’t know what to expect. Many authors have
written in multiple sub-genres under one name. Julie Garwood,
Linda Lael Miller and Karen Robards, for example, are writers who
have a fairly well-established “brands” and legions of readers who
opt to buy by author, not genre. Their publishers wisely alter
covers and cover copy, as well as advertising, to promote the
“different” versions of the brand. Another
option is to create a completely separate name, such as Rachel Lee and
Sue Civil Brown, or Jayne Ann Krentz and Amanda Quick, or Nora Roberts
and J.D. Robb. This completely eliminates the worry about diluting
an audience, but it does increase the cost of marketing and
brand-building. Most authors are open about their duel identities
and encourage readers to give their other ‘self’ a chance. If
the two sub-genres have little cross-over audience (young adult and
erotica, for instance), then this is a recommended avenue. It
might not get you out of the midlist as quickly as having one name, but
it will build overall sales and spread your talent around. The
final option is a “similar” name. Meggin and Meg Cabot,
writing chick lit and young adult is an example, or Nicole and Niki
Burnham, writing romance and young adult. The goal is to bring
along established readers, but make it clear (along with entirely
different covers and even formats) that they should not expect a similar
“read” from these books. Look
long and hard at the opportunities in category romance.
Category, or series romance, published primarily by
Harlequin/Silhouette, is one of the great training grounds for sub-genre
hopping. Writers who sell to one “line” (such as Silhouette
Desire or Harlequin Intrigue) have an easier time sliding from one type
of category romance to another. This allows a writer to flex her
genre-hopping muscles. In addition, the move to single title is
encouraged with the HQN and Mira imprints, and authors who find they are
able to write a longer book with multiple sub-plots and points of view
have the opportunity to do so for their own house, or for others. Moving
into category after selling a single title to a mainstream publisher is
a far less common career choice, but can be a wise one for a prolific,
disciplined writer. I made that move in 2004 for a number of
strategic reasons. Category romance does not require a great deal
of marketing investment, and the readers tend to be loyal line buyers,
so the need to establish a name is less pressing than it is in single
title. In addition, the high print runs ensure a large, new
audience will discover your work – an audience that many believe does
cross-over to single title when they like a particular author. The
timing of category releases can also have a powerful impact on the sales
of a single title. My agent recommends releasing a category book a
month after a single title, to give the single title a sales boost from
readers who enjoy the category and then seek more from the same author.
This kind of carefully-planned timing requires open and regular
communication with your editors, but they want your sales to be as high
as possible and will usually work to schedule releases for the greatest
benefit to everyone. Beware
the Option Clause. If you are inclined to
genre-hop, the biggest impediment to doing so for more than one
publishing house will be the Option Clause in your contract. Be
certain that your agent or literary attorney limits the wording of this
clause to precisely the sub-genre that you have sold. For example,
the publisher should have a right of first refusal on your next
“100,000 word contemporary romantic comedy” – thereby allowing you
to write category, or paranormal, or suspense, or women’s fiction for
another publishing house. If
the clause is general, open-ended, or requires the house have first
refusal on something as vague as “the writer’s next work,” you may
have a difficult time moving to another house or another genre. If
you succeed, you need to keep both or all editors apprised of your
schedule and meet all of your deadlines, remembering that they are, in a
sense, competitors for your time. Like any smart business person,
never let one “customer” think they are less valuable to you than
another. If you’ve recently entered the mid-list, congratulations. The arrival is a tremendous accomplishment for any writer. But if you’d like your stay to be brief, you might consider hopping right out of that bulging middle and into the lead spot in your publisher’s catalog. Happy hopping! |